Cleared Traditional

K231517 - VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products CEA Reagent Pack (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2023
Decision
90d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K231517 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products CEA Reagent Pack. Classified as System, Test, Carcinoembryonic Antigen (product code DHX), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics (Bridgend, GB). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 23, 2023 after a review of 90 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.6010 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K231517 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 25, 2023
Decision Date August 23, 2023
Days to Decision 90 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
14d faster than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 90d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DHX System, Test, Carcinoembryonic Antigen
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.6010
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.