Cleared Traditional

K231529 - CloudPoint FastDesign Chairside (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2024
Decision
293d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K231529 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CloudPoint FastDesign Chairside. Classified as Dental Abutment Design Software For Dental Laboratory (product code PNP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Prismatik Dentalcraft, Inc. (Irvine, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 14, 2024 after a review of 293 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3630 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Prismatik Dentalcraft, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K231529 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 26, 2023
Decision Date March 14, 2024
Days to Decision 293 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
166d slower than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 293d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code PNP Dental Abutment Design Software For Dental Laboratory
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3630
Definition The Device Is Intended To Aid In The Restoration Of Chewing Function By Allowing A Dental Laboratory Or Dental Clinician To Design The Patient-specific Component Of A Dental Abutment (i.e. Abutment Collar And Abutment Post) And Cam Or Create That Component At A Dental Office Or Dental Laboratory Following The Directions Of The Dental Implant System. The Abutment-to-implant Interface/connection Platform Is Not A Patient-specific Component Of The Dental Abutment.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.