Cleared Special

K233670 - Ascension Silicone MCP (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Also includes:
Ascension Silicone PIP

Class II Orthopedic device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 2023
Decision
29d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K233670 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Ascension Silicone MCP. Classified as Prosthesis, Finger, Constrained, Polymer (product code KYJ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Ascension Orthopedics, Inc. (Austin, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 14, 2023 after a review of 29 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Orthopedic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 888.3230 - the FDA orthopedic device regulatory framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Low regulatory complexity profile. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Ascension Orthopedics, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K233670 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 15, 2023
Decision Date December 14, 2023
Days to Decision 29 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Orthopedic (OR)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
93d faster than avg
Panel avg: 122d · This submission: 29d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code KYJ Prosthesis, Finger, Constrained, Polymer
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 888.3230
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Orthopedic devices follow this clearance model.