Cleared Traditional

K243374 - HemosIL CL HIT-IgG(PF4-H) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 2025
Decision
90d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K243374 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the HemosIL CL HIT-IgG(PF4-H). Classified as Platelet Factor 4 Radioimmunoassay (product code LCO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Instrumentation Laboratory (IL) Co. (Bedford, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 28, 2025 after a review of 90 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.7695 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Hematology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Instrumentation Laboratory (IL) Co. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K243374 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 30, 2024
Decision Date January 28, 2025
Days to Decision 90 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
23d faster than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 90d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LCO Platelet Factor 4 Radioimmunoassay
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.7695
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.