Cleared Traditional

K250816 - ADVIA Centaur Anti-Thyroglobulin II (aTgII) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 2025
Decision
261d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K250816 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ADVIA Centaur Anti-Thyroglobulin II (aTgII). Classified as Immunochemical, Thyroglobulin Autoantibody (product code JNL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. (Tarrytown, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 4, 2025 after a review of 261 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5870 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K250816 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 18, 2025
Decision Date December 04, 2025
Days to Decision 261 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
157d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 261d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JNL Immunochemical, Thyroglobulin Autoantibody
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5870
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.