Cleared Traditional

K253447 - Montage Flowable Settable, Resorbable Bone Paste (Burr Hole Cover) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2026
Decision
165d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K253447 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Montage Flowable Settable, Resorbable Bone Paste (Burr Hole Cover). Classified as Cover, Burr Hole (product code GXR), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Orthocon, Inc. (Stamford, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 16, 2026 after a review of 165 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.5250 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Neurology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Orthocon, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K253447 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 02, 2025
Decision Date March 16, 2026
Days to Decision 165 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
17d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 165d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GXR Cover, Burr Hole
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.5250
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.