Cleared Traditional

K770143 - TQC CALIBRATION REFERENCE FOR PLATELETS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1978
Decision
371d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K770143 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TQC CALIBRATION REFERENCE FOR PLATELETS. Classified as Calibrator For Platelet Counting (product code KRY), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Technicon Instruments Corp. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 30, 1978 after a review of 371 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.8175 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Hematology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Technicon Instruments Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K770143 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 24, 1977
Decision Date January 30, 1978
Days to Decision 371 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
258d slower than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 371d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KRY Calibrator For Platelet Counting
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.8175
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.