Cleared Traditional

K771226 - LAS-R TEST PROGRAM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1977
Decision
20d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K771226 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the LAS-R TEST PROGRAM. Classified as Method, Nephelometric, Immunoglobulins (g, A, M) (product code CFN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Hyland Therapeutic Div., Travenol Laboratories (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 21, 1977 after a review of 20 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5510 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Hyland Therapeutic Div., Travenol Laboratories devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K771226 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 01, 1977
Decision Date July 21, 1977
Days to Decision 20 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
68d faster than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 20d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CFN Method, Nephelometric, Immunoglobulins (g, A, M)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5510
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.