Cleared Traditional

K771683 - AMPLIFIER MODEL N3B-EEG

K771683 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for AMPLIFIER MODEL N3B-EEG, manufactured by Honeywell, Inc.. The device is a Class 2 Neurology device with product code GWL cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 14-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1977
Decision
14d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K771683 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the AMPLIFIER MODEL N3B-EEG. Classified as Amplifier, Physiological Signal (product code GWL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Honeywell, Inc. (Walker, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 20, 1977 after a review of 14 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.1835 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Honeywell, Inc. devices

FDA 510(k) Submission Details - K771683

510(k) Number K771683 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 06, 1977
Decision Date September 20, 1977
Days to Decision 14 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
134d faster than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 14d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

GWL Device Classification - Class 2, Special Controls

Product Code GWL Amplifier, Physiological Signal
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.1835
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.