Cleared Traditional

K801852 - MRM-2 OXYGEN CONSUMPTION MONITOR (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K801852 · Waters Assoc., Inc. · Anesthesiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 1980
Decision
16d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K801852 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MRM-2 OXYGEN CONSUMPTION MONITOR. Classified as Computer, Oxygen-uptake (product code BZL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Waters Assoc., Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 20, 1980 after a review of 16 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.1730 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Waters Assoc., Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K801852 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 04, 1980
Decision Date August 20, 1980
Days to Decision 16 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
123d faster than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 16d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code BZL Computer, Oxygen-uptake
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.1730
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.