Cleared Traditional

K811724 - 2M 9810 MICROWAVE OVEN (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K811724 · Travenol Laboratories, S.A. · General Hospital
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1981
Decision
22d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K811724 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the 2M 9810 MICROWAVE OVEN. Classified as Warmer, Microwave, Infusion Fluid (product code LHF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Travenol Laboratories, S.A. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 10, 1981 after a review of 22 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.5725 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Travenol Laboratories, S.A. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K811724 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 18, 1981
Decision Date July 10, 1981
Days to Decision 22 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
106d faster than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 22d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LHF Warmer, Microwave, Infusion Fluid
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.5725
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.