Cleared Traditional

K833672 - HH SUBCUTANEOUS ACCESS PORT (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 1984
Decision
140d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K833672 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the HH SUBCUTANEOUS ACCESS PORT. Classified as Port & Catheter, Implanted, Subcutaneous, Intraventricular (product code LKG), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Holter-Hausner Intl. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 6, 1984 after a review of 140 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.5550 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General Hospital review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Holter-Hausner Intl. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K833672 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 18, 1983
Decision Date March 06, 1984
Days to Decision 140 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
12d slower than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 140d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LKG Port & Catheter, Implanted, Subcutaneous, Intraventricular
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.5550
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.