Cleared Traditional

K841434 - VARICELLA-ZOSTER(IGG) IFA TEST (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Microbiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 1985
Decision
378d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K841434 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the VARICELLA-ZOSTER(IGG) IFA TEST. Classified as Antigen, Cf, (including Cf Control), Varicella-zoster (product code GQW), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Zeus Scientific, Inc. (Raritan, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 19, 1985 after a review of 378 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Microbiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.3900 - the FDA microbiology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Microbiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Zeus Scientific, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K841434 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 06, 1984
Decision Date April 19, 1985
Days to Decision 378 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Microbiology (MI)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
276d slower than avg
Panel avg: 102d · This submission: 378d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GQW Antigen, Cf, (including Cf Control), Varicella-zoster
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.3900
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Microbiology devices follow this clearance model.