Cleared Traditional

K842755 - TITAN GEL ISO DOT CPK PROCEDURE (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K842755 · Helena Laboratories · Chemistry device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1984
Decision
74d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K842755 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TITAN GEL ISO DOT CPK PROCEDURE. Classified as Nad Reduction/nadh Oxidation, Cpk Or Isoenzymes (product code CGS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Helena Laboratories (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 28, 1984 after a review of 74 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1215 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Helena Laboratories devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K842755 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 16, 1984
Decision Date September 28, 1984
Days to Decision 74 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
14d faster than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 74d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CGS Nad Reduction/nadh Oxidation, Cpk Or Isoenzymes
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1215
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.