Cleared Traditional

K844836 - HEMOCLIP X-20 AUTOMATIC HEMOCLIP LIGATING APPLIER (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Microbiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1985
Decision
42d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K844836 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the HEMOCLIP X-20 AUTOMATIC HEMOCLIP LIGATING APPLIER. Classified as Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test, Entamoeba Histolytica & Rel Sp (product code GWD), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Edward Weck, Inc. (Research Triangle Pa, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 23, 1985 after a review of 42 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Microbiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.3220 - the FDA microbiology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Edward Weck, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K844836 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 12, 1984
Decision Date January 23, 1985
Days to Decision 42 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Microbiology (MI)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
60d faster than avg
Panel avg: 102d · This submission: 42d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GWD Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test, Entamoeba Histolytica & Rel Sp
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.3220
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Microbiology devices follow this clearance model.