Cleared Traditional

K854245 - SIGMA ANGIOTENSIN CONVERTING ENZYME 305-UV (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1986
Decision
93d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K854245 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SIGMA ANGIOTENSIN CONVERTING ENZYME 305-UV. Classified as Radioassay, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (product code KQN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Sigma Diagnostics, Inc. (St. Louis, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 22, 1986 after a review of 93 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1090 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Sigma Diagnostics, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K854245 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 21, 1985
Decision Date January 22, 1986
Days to Decision 93 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
5d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 93d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KQN Radioassay, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1090
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.