Cleared Traditional

K860457 - ELECTROCARDIOGRAPH CONTINUOUS MONITOR (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K860457 · Oxford Medilog, Inc. · Neurology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 1986
Decision
84d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K860457 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ELECTROCARDIOGRAPH CONTINUOUS MONITOR. Classified as Nystagmograph (product code GWN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Oxford Medilog, Inc. (Clearwater, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 30, 1986 after a review of 84 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.1460 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Oxford Medilog, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K860457 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 05, 1986
Decision Date April 30, 1986
Days to Decision 84 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
64d faster than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 84d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GWN Nystagmograph
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.1460
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.