Cleared Traditional

K863083 - BETA MEDICAL PRODUCTS EMR-301 HYDRAULIC STRETCHER (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K863083 · Beta Medical Products Co. · General Hospital
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1986
Decision
22d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K863083 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the BETA MEDICAL PRODUCTS EMR-301 HYDRAULIC STRETCHER. Classified as Stretcher, Wheeled (product code FPO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Beta Medical Products Co. (Hudson, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 3, 1986 after a review of 22 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.6910 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Beta Medical Products Co. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K863083 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 12, 1986
Decision Date September 03, 1986
Days to Decision 22 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
106d faster than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 22d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code FPO Stretcher, Wheeled
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.6910
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.