Cleared Traditional

K864101 - COOK (R) VEIN GRAFT RING MARKERS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K864101 · Cook, Inc. · Cardiovascular device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 1986
Decision
9d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K864101 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the COOK (R) VEIN GRAFT RING MARKERS. Classified as Marker, Ostia, Aorto-saphenous Vein (product code KPK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Cook, Inc. (Bloomington, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 30, 1986 after a review of 9 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 878.4650 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Cook, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K864101 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 21, 1986
Decision Date October 30, 1986
Days to Decision 9 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
116d faster than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 9d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KPK Marker, Ostia, Aorto-saphenous Vein
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 878.4650
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.