Cleared Traditional

K864893 - ANTI-CYTOKERATIN MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Pathology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1988
Decision
570d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K864893 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ANTI-CYTOKERATIN MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY. Classified as Cytokeratins (product code LYE), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic (Franklin Lakes, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 7, 1988 after a review of 570 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Pathology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5550 - the FDA pathology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Pathology submissions.

View all Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K864893 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 15, 1986
Decision Date July 07, 1988
Days to Decision 570 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Pathology (PA)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
493d slower than avg
Panel avg: 77d · This submission: 570d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LYE Cytokeratins
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5550
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Pathology devices follow this clearance model.