Cleared Traditional

K865083 - AFFINITY(TM) I UPTAKE IMMUNIT(TM) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1987
Decision
191d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K865083 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the AFFINITY(TM) I UPTAKE IMMUNIT(TM). Classified as Radioassay, Triiodothyronine Uptake (product code KHQ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic (Franklin Lakes, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 9, 1987 after a review of 191 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1715 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K865083 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 30, 1986
Decision Date July 09, 1987
Days to Decision 191 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
103d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 191d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KHQ Radioassay, Triiodothyronine Uptake
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1715
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.