Cleared Traditional

K875266 - SSH-160A ULTRASONIC PULSED ECHO IMAGING SYSTEM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 1988
Decision
129d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K875266 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SSH-160A ULTRASONIC PULSED ECHO IMAGING SYSTEM. Classified as Probe, Blood-flow, Extravascular (product code DPT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Toshiba Medical Systems (Tustin, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 29, 1988 after a review of 129 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.2120 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Toshiba Medical Systems devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K875266 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 22, 1987
Decision Date April 29, 1988
Days to Decision 129 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
4d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 129d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DPT Probe, Blood-flow, Extravascular
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.2120
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.