Cleared Traditional

K881102 - MICROMEDIC MORPHINE RIA KIT (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Toxicology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 1988
Decision
101d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K881102 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MICROMEDIC MORPHINE RIA KIT. Classified as Radioimmunoassay, Morphine (125-i), Goat Antibody Ammonium Sulfate Sep. (product code DOE), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Icn Micromedic Systems (Horsham, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 24, 1988 after a review of 101 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Toxicology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3640 - the FDA toxicology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Toxicology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Icn Micromedic Systems devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K881102 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 15, 1988
Decision Date June 24, 1988
Days to Decision 101 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Toxicology (TX)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
14d slower than avg
Panel avg: 87d · This submission: 101d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DOE Radioimmunoassay, Morphine (125-i), Goat Antibody Ammonium Sulfate Sep.
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3640
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Toxicology devices follow this clearance model.