Cleared Traditional

K903966 - EXTERNAL PACEMAKER ANALYZER MODEL PMA-1 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 1991
Decision
295d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K903966 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the EXTERNAL PACEMAKER ANALYZER MODEL PMA-1. Classified as Analyzer, Pacemaker Generator Function (product code DTC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc. (Winooski, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 19, 1991 after a review of 295 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.3630 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K903966 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 28, 1990
Decision Date June 19, 1991
Days to Decision 295 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
170d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 295d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DTC Analyzer, Pacemaker Generator Function
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.3630
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.