Cleared Traditional

K912404 - TRANSESOPHAGEAL TRANSDUCER THERMAL SAFETY (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 1991
Decision
161d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K912404 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TRANSESOPHAGEAL TRANSDUCER THERMAL SAFETY. Classified as Probe, Blood-flow, Extravascular (product code DPT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Hewlett-Packard Co. (Andover, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 7, 1991 after a review of 161 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.2120 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Hewlett-Packard Co. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K912404 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 30, 1991
Decision Date November 07, 1991
Days to Decision 161 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
54d slower than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 161d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DPT Probe, Blood-flow, Extravascular
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.2120
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.