Cleared Traditional

K920793 - PHILIPS DSI SYSTEM RELEASE 3.2 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1992
Decision
147d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K920793 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PHILIPS DSI SYSTEM RELEASE 3.2. Classified as Camera, X-ray, Fluorographic, Cine Or Spot (product code IZJ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Philips Medical Systems, Inc. (5680 Da Best, NL). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 17, 1992 after a review of 147 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1620 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Philips Medical Systems, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K920793 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 21, 1992
Decision Date July 17, 1992
Days to Decision 147 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
40d slower than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 147d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code IZJ Camera, X-ray, Fluorographic, Cine Or Spot
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1620
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.