Cleared Traditional

K921433 - ATTIC DEFECT PLATE (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Ear, Nose, Throat device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 1993
Decision
358d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K921433 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ATTIC DEFECT PLATE. Classified as Mold, Middle-ear (product code ETC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc. (Memphis, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 18, 1993 after a review of 358 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Ear, Nose, Throat FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 874.3430 - the FDA ear, nose and throat device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ear, Nose, Throat review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K921433 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 25, 1992
Decision Date March 18, 1993
Days to Decision 358 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ear, Nose, Throat (EN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
269d slower than avg
Panel avg: 89d · This submission: 358d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code ETC Mold, Middle-ear
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 874.3430
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ear, Nose, Throat devices follow this clearance model.