Cleared Traditional

K923832 - PHARMACIA CAP SYSTEM IGE FEIA -- MODIFICATION (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 1992
Decision
120d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K923832 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PHARMACIA CAP SYSTEM IGE FEIA -- MODIFICATION. Classified as Ige, Antigen, Antiserum, Control (product code DGC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Kabi Pharmacia, Inc. (New Brunswick, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 25, 1992 after a review of 120 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5510 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Kabi Pharmacia, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K923832 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 28, 1992
Decision Date November 25, 1992
Days to Decision 120 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
16d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 120d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DGC Ige, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5510
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.