Cleared Traditional

K930109 - KOMET MEDICAL SURGICAL POWER ACCESORIES (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Orthopedic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 1993
Decision
226d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K930109 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the KOMET MEDICAL SURGICAL POWER ACCESORIES. Classified as Instrument, Surgical, Sonic And Accessory/attachment (product code JDX), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Brassler USA (Great Neck, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 25, 1993 after a review of 226 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Orthopedic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 888.4580 - the FDA orthopedic device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Orthopedic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Brassler USA devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K930109 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 11, 1993
Decision Date August 25, 1993
Days to Decision 226 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Orthopedic (OR)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
104d slower than avg
Panel avg: 122d · This submission: 226d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JDX Instrument, Surgical, Sonic And Accessory/attachment
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 888.4580
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Orthopedic devices follow this clearance model.