Cleared Traditional

K933267 - AUTOANTIBODY PROFILE-6 ELISA TEST SYSTEM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1993
Decision
162d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K933267 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the AUTOANTIBODY PROFILE-6 ELISA TEST SYSTEM. Classified as Antinuclear Antibody (enzyme-labeled), Antigen, Controls (product code LJM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Zeus Scientific, Inc. (Raritan, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 15, 1993 after a review of 162 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5100 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Zeus Scientific, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K933267 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 06, 1993
Decision Date December 15, 1993
Days to Decision 162 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
58d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 162d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LJM Antinuclear Antibody (enzyme-labeled), Antigen, Controls
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5100
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.