Cleared Traditional

K933455 - COMPUTED ORAL RADIOLOGY SYSTEM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K933455 · Schick Technologies, Inc. · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1994
Decision
201d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K933455 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the COMPUTED ORAL RADIOLOGY SYSTEM. Classified as Unit, X-ray, Intraoral (product code EAP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Schick Technologies, Inc. (Sound Beach, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 31, 1994 after a review of 201 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.1810 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Schick Technologies, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K933455 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 14, 1993
Decision Date January 31, 1994
Days to Decision 201 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
94d slower than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 201d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EAP Unit, X-ray, Intraoral
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.1810
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.