Cleared Traditional

K941628 - 40 MICRON BLOOD TRANSFUSION FILTER (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 1995
Decision
318d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K941628 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the 40 MICRON BLOOD TRANSFUSION FILTER. Classified as Filter, Infusion Line (product code FPB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Douglas Medical Products Corp. (Mundelein, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 16, 1995 after a review of 318 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.5440 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General Hospital review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Douglas Medical Products Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K941628 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 04, 1994
Decision Date February 16, 1995
Days to Decision 318 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
190d slower than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 318d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code FPB Filter, Infusion Line
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.5440
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.