Cleared Traditional

K941992 - CYSTOSCOPE (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Gastroenterology & Urology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 1995
Decision
584d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K941992 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CYSTOSCOPE. Classified as Cystourethroscope (product code FBO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Surgical Technologies, Inc. (Miami Lakes, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 30, 1995 after a review of 584 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.1500 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Gastroenterology & Urology submissions.

View all Surgical Technologies, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K941992 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 25, 1994
Decision Date November 30, 1995
Days to Decision 584 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
454d slower than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 584d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code FBO Cystourethroscope
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.1500
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.