Cleared Traditional

K952060 - QCT-BONE MINERAL ANALYSIS SOFTWARE OR OCT-BMD OPTION OR OCT-5000 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K952060 · Image Analysis, Inc. · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 1995
Decision
34d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K952060 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the QCT-BONE MINERAL ANALYSIS SOFTWARE OR OCT-BMD OPTION OR OCT-5000. Classified as Densitometer, Bone (product code KGI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Image Analysis, Inc. (Columbia, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 5, 1995 after a review of 34 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1170 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Image Analysis, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K952060 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 02, 1995
Decision Date June 05, 1995
Days to Decision 34 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
73d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 34d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KGI Densitometer, Bone
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1170
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.