Cleared Traditional

K952557 - TOTAL T-3 FPIA REAGENT SET, TOTAL T-3 FPIA CALIBRATORS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1996
Decision
236d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K952557 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TOTAL T-3 FPIA REAGENT SET, TOTAL T-3 FPIA CALIBRATORS. Classified as Radioimmunoassay, Total Triiodothyronine (product code CDP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Sigma Diagnostics, Inc. (St. Louis, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 24, 1996 after a review of 236 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1710 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Sigma Diagnostics, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K952557 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 02, 1995
Decision Date January 24, 1996
Days to Decision 236 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
148d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 236d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CDP Radioimmunoassay, Total Triiodothyronine
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1710
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.