Cleared Traditional

K955825 - SMITH S-100 TIME & TEMPERATURE CONTROL (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 1996
Decision
101d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K955825 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SMITH S-100 TIME & TEMPERATURE CONTROL. Classified as Processor, Radiographic-film, Automatic, Dental (product code EGY), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Smith Companies Dental Products (Fremont, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 5, 1996 after a review of 101 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1900 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Smith Companies Dental Products devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K955825 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 26, 1995
Decision Date April 05, 1996
Days to Decision 101 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
6d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 101d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EGY Processor, Radiographic-film, Automatic, Dental
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1900
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.