Cleared Traditional

K960871 - SPECTROLYSE ANTITHROMBIN III (ANTI-XA) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 1996
Decision
163d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K960871 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SPECTROLYSE ANTITHROMBIN III (ANTI-XA). Classified as Antithrombin Iii Quantitation (product code JBQ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medical Diagnostic Technologies, Inc. (Ventura, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 14, 1996 after a review of 163 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.7060 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Hematology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Medical Diagnostic Technologies, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K960871 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 04, 1996
Decision Date August 14, 1996
Days to Decision 163 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
50d slower than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 163d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JBQ Antithrombin Iii Quantitation
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.7060
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.