Cleared Traditional

K962648 - OHMEDA MODEL 5330 ANESTHETIC AGENT MONITOR (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1997
Decision
193d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K962648 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the OHMEDA MODEL 5330 ANESTHETIC AGENT MONITOR. Classified as Analyzer, Gas, Enflurane, Gaseous-phase (anesthetic Concentration) (product code CBQ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Ohmeda Medical (Louisville, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 17, 1997 after a review of 193 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.1500 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Ohmeda Medical devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K962648 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 08, 1996
Decision Date January 17, 1997
Days to Decision 193 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
54d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 193d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CBQ Analyzer, Gas, Enflurane, Gaseous-phase (anesthetic Concentration)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.1500
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.