Cleared Traditional

K972132 - SIGMA DIAGNOSTICS VALPROIC ACID FPIA REAGENT SET, SIGMA DIAGNOSTICS VALPROIC ACID FPIA CALIBRATORS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Toxicology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1997
Decision
54d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K972132 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SIGMA DIAGNOSTICS VALPROIC ACID FPIA REAGENT SET, SIGMA DIAGNOSTICS VALPROIC .... Classified as Enzyme Immunoassay, Valproic Acid (product code LEG), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Sigma Diagnostics, Inc. (St. Louis, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 30, 1997 after a review of 54 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Toxicology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3645 - the FDA toxicology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Sigma Diagnostics, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K972132 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 06, 1997
Decision Date July 30, 1997
Days to Decision 54 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Toxicology (TX)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
33d faster than avg
Panel avg: 87d · This submission: 54d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LEG Enzyme Immunoassay, Valproic Acid
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3645
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Toxicology devices follow this clearance model.