Cleared Traditional

K982822 - FENWAL 20 MICRON PEDIATRIC TRANSFUSION FILTER MODEL 4C7701, FENWAL 20 MICRON PEDIATRIC TRANSFUSION FILTER SET MODEL 4C72 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1998
Decision
50d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K982822 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the FENWAL 20 MICRON PEDIATRIC TRANSFUSION FILTER MODEL 4C7701, FENWAL 20 MICRON .... Classified as Microfilter, Blood Transfusion (product code CAK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Baxter Healthcare Corp (Round Lake, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 30, 1998 after a review of 50 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.5440 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Baxter Healthcare Corp devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K982822 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 11, 1998
Decision Date September 30, 1998
Days to Decision 50 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
78d faster than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 50d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CAK Microfilter, Blood Transfusion
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.5440
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.