Definition
A Not Substantially Equivalent (NSE) determination - identified by decision code DENG in the FDA 510(k) database - is issued when the FDA concludes that a submitted device does not meet the substantial equivalence standard required for clearance. It is the only outcome that results in denial of a 510(k) submission.
Grounds for NSE Determination
The FDA may issue an NSE determination when:
- The new device has a different intended use than the proposed predicate device.
- The new device has different technological characteristics that raise new questions of safety or effectiveness that the submission has not adequately addressed.
- The proposed predicate device is itself not legally marketed or is otherwise invalid.
- The submission contains insufficient data to support a substantial equivalence finding.
NSE Rates by Panel
| Panel | Total Submissions | NSE Decisions | NSE Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Genetics | 19 | 8 | 42.1% |
| Pathology | 1,099 | 23 | 2.1% |
| Microbiology | 7,038 | 62 | 0.88% |
| Neurology | 6,214 | 54 | 0.87% |
| Dental | 12,535 | 9 | 0.07% |
| Orthopedic | 17,766 | 17 | 0.10% |
Options After NSE
- Resubmission - file a new 510(k) with a more appropriate predicate or additional supporting data.
- De Novo Classification - if the device is low-to-moderate risk and lacks a valid predicate, De Novo may be the appropriate pathway.
- Premarket Approval (PMA) - for high-risk devices requiring clinical evidence of safety and effectiveness.
Dataset Insights
Of the 166,200 submissions in the 510k Database dataset, 464 (0.28%) received a Not Substantially Equivalent determination. Search all 510(k) submissions to filter by decision outcome.
FDA References
- The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications - FDA guidance, 2014
Related Terms
Substantial Equivalence - Predicate Device - De Novo Classification - 510(k) Premarket Notification