Definition
The 510(k) Premarket Notification is the primary regulatory pathway for Class II medical devices in the United States. Named after Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, it requires manufacturers to notify the FDA at least 90 days before marketing a new device and to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device.
Legal Basis
The 510(k) pathway was established by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, signed by President Gerald Ford on May 28, 1976. The amendments created a three-class risk-based regulatory framework. Class II devices - which represent the majority of 510(k) submissions - are subject to general and special controls and must demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate to receive clearance.
Submission Types
| Type | Use Case |
|---|---|
| Traditional 510(k) | Standard format for most new devices |
| Abbreviated 510(k) | Devices relying on FDA-recognized standards or special controls |
| Special 510(k) | Modifications to a manufacturer's own previously cleared device |
Review Outcomes
Following review, the FDA issues one of three outcomes:
- Substantially Equivalent (SE) - device is cleared for marketing.
- Not Substantially Equivalent (NSE) - decision code DENG; device cannot be marketed as submitted.
- Additional Information Request - FDA requires more data before making a determination.
Dataset Insights
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total records in dataset (1976-2025) | 166,200 |
| Cleared submissions | 165,719 (99.7%) |
| NSE determinations | 464 (0.28%) |
| Distinct manufacturers | 33,307 |
| FDA review panels | 20 |
| Average review time (cleared) | ~129 days |
| Submissions with clinical trial link | 188 |
| Submissions with third-party review | 3,434 |
| Submissions with PCCP authorization | 91 |
FDA References
Related Terms
Substantial Equivalence - Predicate Device - Not Substantially Equivalent - De Novo Classification - Third-Party Review - PCCP