Cleared Special

K000067 - ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE LIQUID REAGENT-KINETIC, MODELS A504-150 AND A504-500H (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 2000
Decision
10d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K000067 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE LIQUID REAGENT-KINETIC, MODELS A504-150 AND A504-500H. Classified as Nitrophenylphosphate, Alkaline Phosphatase Or Isoenzymes (product code CJE), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Teco Diagnostics (Anaheim, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 20, 2000 after a review of 10 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1050 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Low regulatory complexity profile. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Teco Diagnostics devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K000067 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 10, 2000
Decision Date January 20, 2000
Days to Decision 10 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
78d faster than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 10d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code CJE Nitrophenylphosphate, Alkaline Phosphatase Or Isoenzymes
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1050
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.