Cleared Traditional

K000647 - DATEX-OHMEDA NETWORK AND CENTRAL (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K000647 · Datex-Ohmeda, Inc. · Cardiovascular device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 2000
Decision
136d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K000647 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DATEX-OHMEDA NETWORK AND CENTRAL. Classified as System, Network And Communication, Physiological Monitors (product code MSX), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Datex-Ohmeda, Inc. (Tewksburt, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 13, 2000 after a review of 136 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.2300 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Datex-Ohmeda, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K000647 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 28, 2000
Decision Date July 13, 2000
Days to Decision 136 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
11d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 136d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MSX System, Network And Communication, Physiological Monitors
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.2300
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Peers - MSX System, Network And Communication, Physiological Monitors

All 115
Devices cleared under the same product code (MSX) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K000647.
TigerConnect Alarm Management
K243270 · Tigerconnect · Sep 2025
BeneVision Central Monitoring System
K242728 · Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. · Jul 2025
Central Station
K242750 · Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions, LLC · Jun 2025
ANNE View, Central Hub
K242842 · Sibel Health, Inc. · Jan 2025
Hinscope
K241397 · Hinlab Sas · Nov 2024
Infinity Gateway Suite
K233834 · Draeger Medical Systems, Inc. · Jul 2024