Cleared Abbreviated

K001412 - PM 1800 CONSERVING DEVICE (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through the Abbreviated 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

K001412 · Precision Medical, Inc. · Anesthesiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2001
Decision
320d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K001412 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PM 1800 CONSERVING DEVICE. Classified as Conserver, Oxygen (product code NFB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Precision Medical, Inc. (Northampton, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 20, 2001 after a review of 320 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5905 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Abbreviated 510(k) pathway was used, relying on FDA-recognized standards to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

Device pattern: Standards-based predicate clearance. Standards-verified equivalence. The Abbreviated pathway signals strong alignment with FDA-recognized performance standards - typically associated with lower review burden and faster clearance cycles.

View all Precision Medical, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K001412 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 04, 2000
Decision Date March 20, 2001
Days to Decision 320 days
Submission Type Abbreviated
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
181d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 320d
Pathway characteristics
Standards-based clearance path.

Device Classification

Product Code NFB Conserver, Oxygen
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5905
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.