Cleared Special

K001933 - WAKO AUTOKIT LP(A) & LP(A) CALIBRATOR/COBAS BIO (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

K001933 · Wako Chemicals USA, Inc. · Immunology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 2000
Decision
28d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K001933 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the WAKO AUTOKIT LP(A) & LP(A) CALIBRATOR/COBAS BIO. Classified as Lipoprotein, Low-density, Antigen, Antiserum, Control (product code DFC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Wako Chemicals USA, Inc. (Richmond, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 24, 2000 after a review of 28 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5600 - the FDA immunology device framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Low regulatory complexity profile. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Wako Chemicals USA, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K001933 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 26, 2000
Decision Date July 24, 2000
Days to Decision 28 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
76d faster than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 28d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code DFC Lipoprotein, Low-density, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5600
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.