Cleared Traditional

K002095 - SNAP MODEL 6 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K002095 · Snap Laboratories, LLC · Anesthesiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2001
Decision
234d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K002095 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SNAP MODEL 6. Classified as Ventilatory Effort Recorder (product code MNR), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Snap Laboratories, LLC (Glenview, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 2, 2001 after a review of 234 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.2375 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Snap Laboratories, LLC devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K002095 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 11, 2000
Decision Date March 02, 2001
Days to Decision 234 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
95d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 234d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MNR Ventilatory Effort Recorder
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.2375
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.