Cleared Traditional

EMIT 2000 TOBRAMYCIN ASSAY EMIT 2000 TOBRAMYCIN CALIBRATORS (K003341) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 2001
Decision
89d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K003341 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the EMIT 2000 TOBRAMYCIN ASSAY EMIT 2000 TOBRAMYCIN CALIBRATORS. Classified as Radioimmunoassay, Tobramycin (product code KLB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Syva Co., Dade Behring, Inc. (San Jose, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 22, 2001 after a review of 89 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3900 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Syva Co., Dade Behring, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K003341 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 25, 2000
Decision Date January 22, 2001
Days to Decision 89 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
1d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 89d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KLB Radioimmunoassay, Tobramycin
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3900
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.