Cleared Traditional

K012701 - ULTEGRA SYSTEM RAPID PLATELET FUNCTION ASSAY - ASA (RPFA-ASA) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 2002
Decision
302d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K012701 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ULTEGRA SYSTEM RAPID PLATELET FUNCTION ASSAY - ASA (RPFA-ASA). Classified as System, Automated Platelet Aggregation (product code JOZ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Accumetrics, Inc. (San Diego, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 12, 2002 after a review of 302 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.5700 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Hematology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Accumetrics, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K012701 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 14, 2001
Decision Date June 12, 2002
Days to Decision 302 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
189d slower than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 302d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JOZ System, Automated Platelet Aggregation
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.5700
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.