Cleared Traditional

DUAL ENERGY AND TISSUE EQUALIZATION SOFTWARE OPTION (K013481) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2001
Decision
14d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K013481 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DUAL ENERGY AND TISSUE EQUALIZATION SOFTWARE OPTION. Classified as System, X-ray, Stationary (product code KPR), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by GE Medical Systems (Waukesha, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 2, 2001 after a review of 14 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1680 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all GE Medical Systems devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K013481 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 19, 2001
Decision Date November 02, 2001
Days to Decision 14 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review Yes - reviewed by an FDA-accredited third party
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
93d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 14d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required. Third-party reviewed.

Device Classification

Product Code KPR System, X-ray, Stationary
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1680
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

Tuv Rheinland of North America, Inc.
REINER KRUMME

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.

Regulatory Peers - KPR System, X-ray, Stationary

All 118
Devices cleared under the same product code (KPR) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K013481.
REVOLUTION XR/D DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING SYSTEM WITH TOMOSYNTHESIS
K051967 · Ge Healthcare · Aug 2005
KODAK DIRECTVIEW DR 7500 SYSTEM, MODEL 8791345
K051258 · Eastman Kodak Company · Jun 2005
MODIFICATION TO: REVOLUTION XR/D DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING SYSTEM WITH IMAGE PASTING AND AUTOPOSITIONING
K050704 · General Electric Co. · Apr 2005
MULTIX COMPACT K AND MULTIX L RADIOGRAPHIC X-RAY SYSTEMS
K001201 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · Jun 2000
REVOLUTION TX/I DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHIC TABLE SYSTEM
K992066 · GE Medical Systems · Aug 1999
FV-RF
K984111 · Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · Dec 1998